Influence of preventive remineralizing techniques on surface roughness and volume loss of dentin submitted to erosive and/or abrasive challenges.
Autor: | Carvalho CS; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Madalena IR; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.; School of Dentistry, Presidente Tancredo de Almeida Neves University Center, São João del Rei, MG, Brazil., Kuchler EC; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., de Menezes-Oliveira MA; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Martins VR; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., de Castro DT; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Faraoni JJ; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil., Palma-Dibb RG; Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil., Lepri CP; Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry [J Clin Exp Dent] 2024 Mar 01; Vol. 16 (3), pp. e270-e275. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 01 (Print Publication: 2024). |
DOI: | 10.4317/jced.61006 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The objective this study was to evaluate the influence of preventive remineralizing techniques on surface roughness and volume loss of dentin submitted to erosive and/or abrasive challenges. Material and Methods: One hundred and eighty specimens of bovine root dentin were made; half of each was isolated (without treatment - WT) and half was subjected to the following remineralizing techniques: fluoride varnish (FV); Regenerate Boosting Serum® (RBS); Er,Cr:YSGG laser (L); fluoride varnish+laser (FV+L); Regenerate Boosting Serum®+laser (RBS+L). The specimens were submitted to erosive, abrasive and erosive followed by abrasive challenge. Erosion was carried out for 5 minutes, twice a day for 10 days. Abrasion was performed with an electric toothbrush and slurry solution for 60 seconds. The evaluation was performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for surface roughness; volume loss comparison was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc ( p <0.05). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the surface roughness of the reference area in relation to the areas submitted to different types of treatment and challenges ( p >0.05). Regarding volume loss, the untreated group submitted to erosive/abrasive challenges showed greater percentage of volume loss compared to the other groups ( p <0.05). Conclusions: It is concluded that preventive remineralizing techniques are effective in maintaining dentin volume after erosive/abrasive challenges. Key words: YSGG lasers, Dentin, Erosion, Tooth Abrasion. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. (Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |