The Use of Medical Services for Low-Acuity Emergency Cases in Germany: Protocol for a Multicenter Observational Pilot Study.
Autor: | Nau LM; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Laux G; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Altiner A; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Szecsenyi J; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Leutgeb R; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | JMIR research protocols [JMIR Res Protoc] 2024 Apr 10; Vol. 13, pp. e54002. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 10. |
DOI: | 10.2196/54002 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The increasing number of requests for help for acutely ill patients and their management is a major problem in the health systems of many countries, but especially in Germany. Rescue coordination centers and ambulances in Germany are increasingly overloaded. As a result, rides as a part of rescue operations have been increasing in length for years, yet a relevant proportion of these operations represent low-acuity calls (LACs). The basic objective of this pilot study is the quantitative analysis of the potential misuse of requests to the rescue control center. Indications for alternative treatment options and how to handle these treatment options in nonacute, non-life-threatening health conditions, such as minor injuries or minor infectious diseases, will be assessed. The identification of these LACs is vital in order to prevent health care resources in emergency medical care becoming inadequate. Objective: The overarching goal of this study is to determine the percentage of unnecessary rescue missions on site and subsequently to obtain an impression of the paramedics' assessment of alternative treatment options or alternative methods of rescue transportation. Methods: This will be an exploratory, noninterventional, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. The study is multicentric, with 21 ambulances in 12 different locations. The data for this study were collected via a questionnaire, newly developed for this study, for rescue personnel. Additionally, secondary data from the responsible control center will be linked and processed in an initial descriptive analysis. This descriptive analysis will form the basis for a subsequent variance analysis. Results: Data collection started as projected on September 18, 2023, and was ongoing until end of November 2023. We expect the documentation of several thousand rescue operations. We expect the following study results: (1) many unnecessary rescue operations, (2) immediate on-site assessment of correct care and treatment, and (3) patients' reasons for calling a rescue coordination center. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first observational study in which acute rescue operations are recorded on site. The focus of this study is on the trained paramedics' assessment of whether rescue operations are necessary or not. Additionally, alternative treatments, such as out-of-hours care service or primary care service, are shown for each individual case. The study also intends to cover the question of which factors are relevant and statistically significantly connected to the misuse of ambulances. Trial Registration: German Register for Clinical Studies (Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien) DRKS00032510; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032510. International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/54002. (©Lara Maria Nau, Gunter Laux, Attila Altiner, Joachim Szecsenyi, Rüdiger Leutgeb. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 10.04.2024.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |