Distinguishing ASH clinical practice guidelines from other forms of ASH clinical advice.

Autor:	Cuker A; Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA., Kunkle R; American Society of Hematology, Washington, DC., Bercovitz RS; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL., Byrne M; Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN., Djulbegovic B; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC., Haberichter SL; Versiti Diagnostic Labs and Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI.; Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI., Holter-Chakrabarty J; Department of Medicine, BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK., Lottenberg R; Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., Pai M; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada., Rezende SM; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Seftel MD; Canadian Blood Services, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada., Silverstein RL; Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin and Versiti Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI., Terrell DR; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK., Cheung MC; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Blood advances [Blood Adv] 2024 Jun 11; Vol. 8 (11), pp. 2960-2963.
DOI:	10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011102
Abstrakt:	Abstract: The American Society of Hematology (ASH) develops a variety of resources that provide guidance to clinicians on the diagnosis and management of blood diseases. These resources include clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and other forms of clinical advice. Although both ASH CPGs and other forms of clinical advice provide recommendations, they differ with respect to the methods underpinning their development, the principal type of recommendations they offer, their transparency and concordance with published evidence, and the time and resources required for their development. It is crucial that end users be aware of the differences between CPGs and other forms of clinical advice and that producers and publishers of these resources use clear and unambiguous terminology to facilitate their distinction. The objective of this article is to highlight the similarities and differences between ASH CPGs and other forms of ASH clinical advice and discuss the implications of these differences for end users. (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu