| Autor: |
Petty GH; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.; Department of Physiology, Anatomy, & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom., Bruno RM; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.; Department of Physiology, Anatomy, & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
BioRxiv : the preprint server for biology [bioRxiv] 2024 Nov 04. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 04. |
| DOI: |
10.1101/2024.03.22.586242 |
| Abstrakt: |
Each sensory modality has its own primary and secondary thalamic nuclei. While the primary thalamic nuclei are well understood to relay sensory information from the periphery to the cortex, the role of secondary sensory nuclei is elusive. We trained head-fixed mice to ateend to one sensory modality while ignoring a second modality, namely to ateend to touch and ignore vision, or vice versa. Arrays were used to record simultaneously from secondary somatosensory thalamus (POm) and secondary visual thalamus (LP). In mice trained to respond to tactile stimuli and ignore visual stimuli, POm was robustly activated by touch and largely unresponsive to visual stimuli. A different pateern was observed when mice were trained to respond to visual stimuli and ignore touch, with POm now more robustly activated during visual trials. This POm activity was not explained by differences in movements (i.e., whisking, licking, pupil dilation) resulting from the two tasks. Post hoc histological reconstruction of array tracks through POm revealed that subregions varied in their degree of plasticity. LP exhibited similar phenomena. We conclude that behavioral training reshapes activity in secondary thalamic nuclei. Secondary nuclei respond to the same behaviorally relevant, reward-predicting stimuli regardless of stimulus modality. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
