Management of Humeral Shaft Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Individual Treatment Modalities.

Autor:	Colasanti CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Anil U; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Cerasani MN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Li ZI; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Morgan AM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Simovitch RW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, FL., Leucht P; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and., Zuckerman JD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY; and.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of orthopaedic trauma [J Orthop Trauma] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 38 (7), pp. e257-e266.
DOI:	10.1097/BOT.0000000000002808
Abstrakt:	Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis of level I and II evidence comparing different management techniques to define the optimum treatment method for humeral shaft fractures (HSFs). Data Sources: A systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was screened from 2010 to 2023. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were evidence level I or II studies comparing nonoperative and/or operative repair techniques including open reduction internal fixation plate osteosynthesis (ORIF-Plate), minimally invasive percutaneous plating (MIPO), and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for the management of HSFs (OTA/AO 12A, B, C). Data Extraction: The risk of bias and methodologic quality of evidence were assessed according to the guidelines designed by the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and Cochrane Methods Bias Group. Data Synthesis: Network meta-analysis was conducted with a frequentist approach with a random-effects model using the netmeta package version 0.9-6 in R. Results: A total of 25 studies (1908 patients) were included. MIPO resulted in the lowest complication rate (2.1%) when compared with ORIF-Plate (16.1%) [odds ratio (OR), 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.49]. MIPO resulted in the lowest nonunion rate (0.65%) compared with all management techniques (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.98), whereas Non-Op resulted in the highest (15.87%) (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.98-6.11). MIPO demonstrated the lowest rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy overall (2.2%) and demonstrated a significantly lower rate compared with ORIF-Plate (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.71, P = 0.02). IMN resulted in the lowest rate of deep infection (1.1%) when compared with ORIF-Plate (8.6%; P = 0.013). MIPO resulted in a significantly lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (3.86 ± 5.2) and higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (98.2 ± 1.4) than ORIF-Plate (19.5 ± 9.0 and 60.0 ± 5.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results from this study support that surgical management results in better postoperative functional outcomes, leads to higher union rates, reduces fracture healing time, reduces revision rate, and decreases malunion rates in patients with HSFs. In addition, MIPO resulted in statistically higher union rates, lowest complication rate, lowest rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy, and lower intraoperative time while resulting in better postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores when compared with nonoperative and operative (ORIF and IMN) treatment modalities. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu