Immediate versus delayed implant placement of novel fully tapered tissue-level implants - A retrospective multicenter clinical study.

Autor: Schiegnitz E; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany., Sagheb K; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany., Raahimi L; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany., König J; Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany., Azaripour A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.; Private Praxis, Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany., Al-Nawas B; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical oral implants research [Clin Oral Implants Res] 2024 Jun; Vol. 35 (6), pp. 668-676. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 04.
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14263
Abstrakt: Objectives: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of novel fully tapered tissue-level implants in immediate implant placement (type 1) versus late implant placement (type 4) for the first time.
Materials and Methods: For this clinical study, 318 fully tapered tissue-level implants in 65 patients were inserted immediately (n = 68 implants) or late (n = 250 implants) in two different centers. Implant survival and success rates and marginal bone levels were analyzed.
Results: After a mean follow-up of 12.0 ± 5 months, implant survival rates were 97.8% for all implants. No statistically significant difference in implant survival rates between type 1 and type 4 could be detected (98.5% vs 97.6%, HR 0.70, 95%-CI 0.084-5.81). Neither for implant length (HR 0.53, 95%-CI 0.055-5.08) nor for implant width (HR 0.27, CI 0.028-2.55), a significant influence on implant survival could be detected. Type of used biomaterial for filling the gap and immediate loading showed no effect on implant survival. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.02 ± 0.05 mm for type 1 and 0.04 ± 0.1 for type 4.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study and the short follow-up, the results demonstrated comparable high survival and success rates and stable marginal bone levels for type 1 and type 4 placement of this novel tissue-level implant (no clinical trial registration as retrospective study design).
(© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: