| Autor: |
Virsilas E; Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania., Valiulis A; Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania., Kubilius R; Department of Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania., Peciuliene S; Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania., Liubsys A; Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background and objectives: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) frequently necessitates respiratory support. While non-invasive methods are typically the preferred approach, mechanical ventilation becomes necessary for patients with insufficient response. Our study aimed to compare two common respiratory support modes, volume-targeted mechanical ventilation and non-invasive ventilation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), using electrical impedance tomography. Materials and Methods : Infants with very low birth weight and gestational ages of less than 32 weeks were eligible for inclusion in the study. All enrolled infants were beyond the transitional period (>72 h of age). The infants were divided into two groups: infants receiving invasive respiratory support through an endotracheal tube and infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. We used electrical impedance tomography to assess end-expiratory lung impedance (EELZ), DeltaZ, heterogeneity, and regional ventilation distribution. Patients were evaluated at 0, 30, and 60 min after assuming the supine position to examine potential time-related effects. Results : Our study initially enrolled 97 infants, and the final analysis included a cohort of 72 infants. Ventilated infants exhibited significantly larger EELZ compared to their non-invasive counterparts ( p = 0.026). DeltaZ was also greater in the invasive respiratory support group ( p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was higher in the non-invasive group and did not change significantly over time. The non-invasive group demonstrated significantly greater ventilation in the dependent lung areas compared to intubated patients ( p = 0.005). Regional distribution in the left lung was lower than in the right lung in both groups; however, this difference was significantly more pronounced in intubated patients ( p < 0.001). Conclusions : Our study revealed that volume-targeted mechanical ventilation results in higher EELZ and DeltaZ compared to spontaneously breathing infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. However, lung heterogeneity was lower during mechanical ventilation. Our study also reaffirmed that spontaneous breathing promotes greater involvement of the dependent lung compared to mechanical ventilation. |
