Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

Autor:	Miller MM; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Mayorov S; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Ganti R; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Nguyen JV; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Rochman CM; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Caley M; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Jahjah J; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Repich K; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Patrie JT; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA., Anderson RT; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA., Harvey JA; Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA., Rooney TB; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of breast imaging [J Breast Imaging] 2024 May 27; Vol. 6 (3), pp. 277-287.
DOI:	10.1093/jbi/wbae012
Abstrakt:	Objective: We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend. Results: One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P = .027). Conclusion: Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography. (© Society of Breast Imaging 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu