Trends in ophthalmology applicants going unmatched in the Canadian Resident Matching Service.

Autor:	Bondok M; UBC Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada., Bondok MS; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada., Law C; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada., Nathoo N; UBC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, British Columbia, Canada., Damji KF; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Canadian medical education journal [Can Med Educ J] 2024 Feb 29; Vol. 15 (1), pp. 62-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 29 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.36834/cmej.77287
Abstrakt:	Background: Applicants to ophthalmology have high rates of going unmatched during the CaRMS process, but how this compares to other competitive or surgical specialties remains unclear. Our research aims to examine this phenomenon by identifying trends and comparing match data with other specialties, to identify disparities that may inform the need for future interventions to improve the match process for applicants. Methods: We used a cross-sectional analysis of data provided by CaRMS on the residency match from 2013 to 2022. Results: We obtained data from 608 ophthalmology, 5,153 surgery, and 3,092 top five (most competitive) specialty first choice applicants from 2013-2022. Ophthalmology applicants were more likely to go unmatched (18.9% [120/608]) than applicants to the top five (11.9% [371/3,092]) and surgical (13.5% [702/5,153]) specialties (p<0.001) and were twice as likely to rank no alternate disciplines (31.8%, p < 0.001) over the study period. In the first iteration, when alternate disciplines were ranked, the match rate to alternate disciplines was highest for ophthalmology applicants (0.41, p < 0.001). The majority (57.8%) of unmatched ophthalmology applicants do not participate in the second iteration. Conclusion: Compared to other competitive specialties, first choice ophthalmology applicants were more likely to go unmatched, rank no alternate disciplines, and choose not to participate in the second iteration. Ophthalmology applicant behaviours should be further studied to help explain these study findings. Competing Interests: The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any materials discussed in this article. (© 2024 Bondok, Bondok, Law, Nathoo, Damji; licensee Synergies Partners.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu