Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?
| Autor: | Eckert MJ; Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA matteckert1@gmail.com.; Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA., Varpio L; Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.; Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Soh M; Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA., Cristancho S; Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Mar 23; Vol. 14 (3), pp. e076000. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 23. |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076000 |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: This qualitative study explores the characteristics of a specialised military medical rapid response team (MRRT), the surgical resuscitation team (SRT). Despite mixed evidence of efficacy, civilian MRRTs are widely employed, with significant variation in structure and function. Recent increased use of these teams to mitigate patient risk in challenging healthcare scenarios, such as global pandemics, mass casualty events and resource-constrained health systems, mandates a reconceptualisation of how civilian MRRTs are created, trained and used. Here, we study the core functions and foundational underpinnings of SRTs and discuss how civilian MRRTs might learn from their military counterparts. Design: Semistructured interview-based study using Descriptive Qualitative Research methodology and Thematic Analysis. Setting: Remote audio interviews conducted via Zoom. Participants: Participants included 15 members of the United States Special Operations Command SRTs, representing all medical specialties of the SRT as well as operational planners. Results: Adaptability was identified as a core function of SRTs and informed by four foundational underpinnings: mission variability, shared values and principles, interpersonal and organisational trust and highly effective teaming. Our findings provide three important insights for civilian MRRTs: (1) team member roles should not be defined by silos of professional specialisation, (2) trust is a key factor in the teaming process and (3) team principles and values result in and are reinforced by organisational trust. Conclusion: This study offers the first in-depth investigation of a unique military MRRT. Important insights that may offer benefit to civilian MRRT practices include enabling the breakdown of traditional division of labour, allowing for and promoting deep interpersonal and professional familiarity, and facilitating a cycle of positive reinforcement between teams and organisations. Future investigation of small team limitations, comparability to civilian MRRTs, and the team relationship to the larger organisation are needed to better understand how these teams function in a healthcare system and translate to civilian practice. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|