Opioid prescription usage and disposal after provider education and SMS-based parent education.
Autor: | Mohankumar K; Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Urology, USA., Rossman AH; University of Iowa, Department of Urology, USA., Yong R; Texas Children's Hospital, USA., Thao A; Children's Wisconsin, USA., Sheridan K; Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Urology, USA., Roth EB; Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Urology, USA; Children's Wisconsin, USA. Electronic address: eroth@childrenswi.org. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of pediatric urology [J Pediatr Urol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 20 (3), pp. 497.e1-497.e6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 07. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.03.001 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Adequate pain control after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery is important for both providers and caregivers; however, opioid pain medications are often prescribed in excess of utilization. The resultant excess opioid medication has potential to be diverted or misused. While families are instructed to dispose of leftover opioids, a significant proportion may not dispose of leftover medication. We performed a quality improvement (QI) initiative within a tertiary academic care center to examine opioid excess, opioid disposal, and whether a two-component QI intervention of provider education and family education via automated SMS messages on opioid disposal could improve excess opioid prescribing and leftover opioid disposal. Materials and Methods: Prospective parent surveys were performed on a baseline cohort of 73 patients undergoing outpatient pediatric urologic surgery between July 27 and September 4, 2020. Based on baseline data, a two-component quality improvement initiative was implemented. The first component was non-binding surgeon education regarding opioid prescribing versus opioid utilization. The second component was initiation of automated SMS messages to families after surgery with information on expected postoperative course and hyperlinked instructions for opioid disposal with GPS search for opioid disposal sites nearby. We then repeated the survey for a second cohort of patients between September 14 and October 29, 2021, including additional questions regarding SMS message utility. Results: Of 73 patients in the baseline group, 46% were prescribed opioids (Summary Table). Of patients prescribed opioids, a median of 3 doses were used and 96% had leftover opioid medication. Seventeen percent of parents in the baseline group disposed of unused opioids prior to survey completion (1-4 weeks postop). After the intervention, 19 of 74 (26%) patients were prescribed opioids. In the group that received opioids, a median of 2 doses were used and 63% reported disposing of opioids. Ninety-six percent of parents reported satisfaction with SMS messages. Discussion: Many competing priorities exist for surgical providers and parents of children undergoing outpatient pediatric urologic surgery. A passive program that delivers just-in-time information in the postoperative period has high utility for both parents and providers. Conclusions: Automated SMS messages and provider education about opioid utilization are associated with decreased excess opioid after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery and improved opioid disposal rates by parents. These interventions are easily implemented without significant manpower and should be considered by organizations interested in decreasing excess community opioids after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery. Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. (Copyright © 2024 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |