| Autor: |
Valone ALY; Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, LLC, Arlington, Virginia, USA., Meade AW; Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of personality assessment [J Pers Assess] 2024 Nov-Dec; Vol. 106 (6), pp. 819-831. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 19. |
| DOI: |
10.1080/00223891.2024.2326893 |
| Abstrakt: |
Self-report assessments are the standard for personality measurement, but motivated respondents are able to manipulate or fake their responses to typical Likert scale self-report. Although progress has been made in research seeking to reduce faking, most of it has focused on normative personality traits such as those measured by the five factor model. The measurement of socially aversive personality (e.g., the Dark Triad) is less well-researched. The negative aspects of socially aversive traits increase the opportunity and motivation of respondents to fake typical single-stimulus self-report assessments underscoring the need for faking resistant response formats. A possible way to reduce faking that has been explored in basic personality research is the use of the forced-choice response format. This study applied this method to socially aversive traits and illustrated best practices to create new multidimensional forced-choice and single-stimulus measures of socially aversive personality traits. Results indicated that participants were able to artificially alter their scores when asked to respond like an ideal job applicant, and counter to expectations, the forced-choice format did not decrease faking. Our results indicate that even when best practices are followed, forced-choice format is not a panacea for respondent faking. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
