Does the use of universal adhesive systems improve the durability of the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel?

Autor:	de Resende IS; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Cunha DA; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Silva PB; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Damasceno JX; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Aragão LR; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Vieira-Meyer AP; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil)., Neri JR; Master of Dental Sciences, University Center Christus (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil).
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry [J Clin Exp Dent] 2024 Feb 01; Vol. 16 (2), pp. e178-e185. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 01 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.4317/jced.61247
Abstrakt:	Background: Universal adhesive systems used for restorative clinical procedures are like orthodontics and may be a viable option. This study evaluated the effectiveness of universal adhesive systems in enhancing the durability of the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic brackets to enamel. Material and Methods: 100 bovine incisors were divided into five groups (n=20), according to the applied adhesive systems: Primer Transbond XT; Ambar; Ambar Universal; Single Bond Universal; Adper Single Bond 2. Bracket from each tooth were submitted to SBS test after 24 hours, and 12 months later. The amount of remaining adhesive was evaluated through ARI. Results: After 24 hours, there was no difference in BS between the control and the other groups (p>0.05). However, there were difference between TOTALETCHING1 group and the Ambar Universal ( p =0.015) and Single Bond Universal groups ( p =0.011). After 12 months, Primer Transbond XT, Ambar, Ambar Universal and Adper Single Bond 2 showed no differences in the SBS ( p >0.05). Nonetheless, Single Bond Universal presented superior result when compared to Primer Transbond XT ( p =0.046) and Ambar ( p =0.011) groups. The SBS of all groups reduced significantly after 12 months ( p <0.05). There was no difference between ARI scores in each individually assessed group ( p >0.05), for both periods. Following 24 hours, a difference was observed between the groups ( p =0.043), fact that didn't occur after 12 months ( p =0.109). Conclusions: Adhesive systems, such as Ambar Universal and Single Bond Universal are efficient in bonding orthodontic brackets to enamel when associated with Transbond XT adhesive paste. Key words: Bond strength; Primer Transbond XT, orthodontic brackets, adhesive systems. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare that orn have no conflicts of interest regarding this research study. There are no financial or personal relationships with any individuals or organizations that could potentially bias or influence the interpretation of the results. The research was conducted in na unbiased and impartial manner, with the sole purpose of contributing to scientific knowledge. (Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu