Environmental sustainability of post-orthodontic dental retainers: a comparative life-cycle assessment of Hawley and Essix retainers.

Autor:	Da Tan TY; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Duane B; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Hussein A; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Samsonova A; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Sizun G; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Shakerdi L; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Taqi R; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Wolfram S; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Ziaeefard N; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Sagheri D; School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	European journal of orthodontics [Eur J Orthod] 2024 Apr 01; Vol. 46 (2).
DOI:	10.1093/ejo/cjae012
Abstrakt:	Background: Environmental sustainability has been brought into the limelight due to the global climate crisis. This crisis is driven by human activities and even the healthcare sector is no exception. Within dentistry, orthodontics is a large global market; hence, the use of post-orthodontic retainers has a significant environmental footprint. The aim of this study was to determine the environmental sustainability of post-orthodontic retention using Hawley and Essix retainers. Materials and Methods: A comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to compare the environmental impact of both retainers. All inputs and outputs were accounted for using the Ecoinvent database, v3.7.1, and openLCA software. Sixteen impact categories were used to determine their environmental burden. Results: Of the 16 impact categories, the Hawley had a greater environmental burden than the Essix retainer in 12 categories. The Hawley's most significant contributors to its impact values are factory manufacturing and in-house production, with an average of 41.45% and 52.52%, respectively. For the Essix, the greatest contributor is factory manufacturing, with an average of 64.63%. However, when factoring in the lifespan of the retainers, the Essix would have a greater environmental impact than the Hawley retainer. Limitations: This study employed a comparative LCA. There were also assumptions made, but these were supported by research. Conclusions: On the basis of the evidence gathered in this study, Hawley retainers are more environmentally sustainable than Essix retainers. These results would better enable clinicians to factor in the environmental impact and make informed decisions on the choice of retainer type. (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu