Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal.
Autor: | Francalancia S; Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: stephanie_francalancia@brown.edu., Mehta K; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA., Shrestha R; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Phuyal D; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Bikash D; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Yadav M; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Nakarmi K; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Rai S; Kirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal., Sharar S; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA., Stewart BT; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA., Fudem G; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries [Burns] 2024 Jun; Vol. 50 (5), pp. 1160-1173. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 15. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.008 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Enteral resuscitation (EResus) is operationally advantageous to intravenous resuscitation for burn-injured patients in some low-resource settings. However, there is minimal guidance and no training materials for EResus tailored to non-burn care providers. We aimed to develop and consumer-test a training flipbook with doctors and nurses in Nepal to aid broader dissemination of this life-saving technique. Materials and Methods: We used individual cognitive interviews with Nepali (n = 12) and international (n = 4) burn care experts to define key elements of EResus and specific concepts for its operationalization at primary health centers and first-level hospitals in Nepal. Content, prototype illustrations, and wireframe layouts were developed and revised with the burn care experts. Subsequently, eight consumer testing focus groups with Nepali stakeholders (5-10 people each) were facilitated. Prompts were generated using the Questionnaire Appraisal System (QAS) framework. The flipbook was iteratively revised and tested based on consumer feedback organized according to the domains of clarity, assumptions, knowledge/memory, and sensitivity/bias. Results and Discussion: The flipbook elements were iterated until consumers made no additional requests for changes. Examples of consumer inputs included: clarity-minimize medical jargon, add shrunken organs and wilted plants to represent burn shock; assumptions-use locally representative figures, depict oral rehydration salts sachet instead of a graduated bottle; knowledge/memory-clarify complex topics, use Rule-of-9 s and depict approximately 20% total body surface area to indicate the threshold for resuscitation; sensitivity/bias-reduce anatomic illustration details (e.g. urinary catheter placement, body contours). Conclusion: Stakeholder engagement, consumer testing, and iterative revision can generate knowledge translation products that reflect contextually appropriate education materials for inexperienced burn providers. The EResus Training Flipbook can be used in Nepal and adapted to other contexts to facilitate the implementation of EResus globally. Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None. (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |