Effects of task shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

Autor:	Paier-Abuzahra M; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria., Posch N; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria nicole.posch@medunigraz.at., Spary-Kainz U; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria., Radl-Karimi C; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria., Semlitsch T; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria., Jeitler K; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria., Siebenhofer A; Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.; Institute for General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Mar 08; Vol. 14 (3), pp. e078414. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 08.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078414
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Task-shifting from primary care physicians (PCPs) to nurses is one option to better and more efficiently meet the needs of the population in primary care and to overcome PCP shortages. This protocol outlines an overview of systematic reviews to assess the effects of delegation or substitution by nurses of PCPs' activities regarding clinical, patient-relevant, professional and health services-related outcomes. Methods and Analysis: We will conduct a systematic literature search for secondary literature in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and Health Technology Assessments in German and English comprising randomised controlled trials and prospective controlled trials will be considered for inclusion. Search terms will include Medical Subject Headings combined with free text words. At least one-third of abstracts and full-text articles are reviewed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. We will only consider reviews if they include controlled trials, if the profession that substituted or delegated tasks was a nurse, if the profession of the control was a PCP, if the assessed intervention was the same in the intervention and control group and if the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire score is ≥5. The corrected covered area will be calculated to describe the degree of overlap of studies in the reviews included in the study. We will report the overview according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Ethics and Dissemination: The overview of secondary literature does not require the approval of an Ethics Committee and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020183327. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu