No Differences in Clinical, Functional, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Trial of Nonoperative Management Before Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Autor:	Patel UJ; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and., Holloway MR; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and., Carroll TJ; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and., Soin SP; OrthoIndy Trauma, St. Vincent Trauma Center, St. Vincent Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Indianapolis, IN., Ketz JP; University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of orthopaedic trauma [J Orthop Trauma] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 214-219.
DOI:	10.1097/BOT.0000000000002796
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To test the hypothesis that primary osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures may lead to more favorable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes than fixation following a trial of nonoperative management. Design: Retrospective cohort review. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patient Selection Criteria: Adult patients who presented with humeral shaft fractures and ultimately underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from May 2011 to May 2021. Patients who underwent ORIF within 2 weeks of injury were grouped into the primary osteosynthesis cohort, and patients who underwent ORIF >4 weeks from the date of injury were grouped into the trial of nonoperative cohort. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Postoperative complications, elbow arc of motion, time to radiographic union, and patient-reported outcomes were investigated and compared between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts. Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients fit the study criteria, 84 underwent primary osteosynthesis and 43 trialed initial nonoperative treatment. No differences were found in patient demographics between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts, including age (53 ± 19 vs. 57 ± 18; P = 0.25), sex (39% vs. 44% male, 61% vs. 56% female; P = 0.70), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (30 ± 6 vs. 32 ± 9; P = 0.38). The average time to operative intervention in the primary osteosynthesis group was 4 days (0-14 days) and 105 days (28-332 days) in the trial of nonoperative treatment group ( P < 0.01). No differences were found with regard to intraoperative blood loss, total operative time, time to radiographic union (determined using the Radiographic Union Scores for Humeral scoring system), or overall complication rates, including primary and secondary radial nerve injuries ( P = 0.23 and 0.86, respectively). Patients reported similar patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pain interference ( P = 0.73), depression (D) ( P = 0.99), and physical function ( P = 0.66) scores at their 6-month postsurgical follow-up visits. Conclusions: Patients who attempted a trial of nonoperative management for humeral shaft fractures before ORIF had similar clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes as those who underwent primary osteosynthesis. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu