Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.

Autor: Bedi A; University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand., Russell PN; University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand., Helton WS; University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. whelton@gmu.edu.; Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 3F5, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. whelton@gmu.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Experimental brain research [Exp Brain Res] 2024 Apr; Vol. 242 (4), pp. 949-958. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 06.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06799-7
Abstrakt: In the current investigation, we modified the high Go, low No-Go Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). Some researchers argue a commission error, an inappropriate response to a No-Go stimulus, in the SART is due to the participant being inattentive, or perceptually decoupled, during stimulus onset. Response delays in the SART reduce commission errors. A response delay may therefore enable a participant who is initially inattentive to recouple their attention in time to appropriately perceive the stimulus and withhold a response to a No-Go stimulus. However, shortening stimulus display duration in the SART should limit the possibility of the participant identifying the stimulus later, if they are initially not attending the stimulus. A response delay should not reduce commission errors if stimulus duration is kept to the minimum duration enabling stimulus recognition. In two experiments, we shortened stimulus onset to offset duration and added response delays of varying lengths. In both experiments, even when stimulus duration was shortened, response delays notably reduced commission errors if the delay was greater than 250 ms. In addition, using the Signal Detection Theory perspective in which errors of commission in the SART are due to a lenient response bias-trigger happiness, we predicted that response delays would result in a shift to a more conservative response bias in both experiments. These predictions were verified. The errors of commission in the SART may not be a measures of conscious awareness per se, but instead indicative of the level of participant trigger happiness-a lenient response bias.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: