Spinal manipulation does not improve short-term pain and function in persons with painful shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
| Autor: | Brindisino F; Department of Medicine and Health Science 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise c/o Cardarelli Hospital, C/da Tappino, Campobasso, Italy., Garzonio F; Department of Medicine and Health Science 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise c/o Cardarelli Hospital, C/da Tappino, Campobasso, Italy., Giovannico G; Department of Medicine and Health Science 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise c/o Cardarelli Hospital, C/da Tappino, Campobasso, Italy., Isaia F; Isaia Physical Therapy Private Practice, Marsala, Italy., Fiorentino F; Department of Medicine and Health Science 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise c/o Cardarelli Hospital, C/da Tappino, Campobasso, Italy., Cavaggion C; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Research Group MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Mourad F; Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Differdange, Luxembourg.; Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute A.s.b.l., Differdange, Luxembourg., Innocenti T; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Disability and rehabilitation [Disabil Rehabil] 2024 Dec; Vol. 46 (25), pp. 6051-6068. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 29. |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09638288.2024.2322025 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: To investigate the benefit of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) in improving pain and disability in persons with painful shoulder as primary outcomes. Function, quality of life, persons (and clinicians) satisfaction, adverse events rate, and time for recovery were secondary outcomes. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted and MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and PEDro until 20 September 2023 were investigated. Two thousand eight hundred and ninety-nine records were retrieved and nine studies were included. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence of the pooled results was graded with GRADE approach. Results: The analysis included nine studies (441 persons). The pooled results showed non-significant differences between HVLAT versus sham in pain at pre-post follow-up (MD -0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.60; 0.35; p = 0.61, I 2 = 0%), and at <4 days follow-up (SMD 0.16, 95%CI -0.16; 0.48; p = 0.34, I 2 = 23%); in function at <4 days follow-up (SMD -0.29, 95%CI -0.69; 0.11; p = 0.16, I 2 = 50%). The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. Conclusions: HVLAT was not more effective than sham in improving pain and function at pre-post and at <4 days follow-up. When used as an "add-on technique", HVLAT did not improve pain nor disability. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|