Assessment of Interaural Attenuation in Infants and Young Children Using Bone-Conducted Auditory Brainstem Response.

Autor:	Kariv L; Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.; Hearing and Language Clinic, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, Ashdod, Israel., Taitelbaum-Swead R; Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.; Speech Perception and Listening Effort Lab in the Name of Prof. Mordechai Himelfarb, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.; Meuhedet Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel., Levit Y; Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.; Hearing and Balance Clinic, Shamir Medical Center, Beer Yaakov, Israel.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Ear and hearing [Ear Hear] 2024 Jul-Aug 01; Vol. 45 (4), pp. 999-1009. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 16.
DOI:	10.1097/AUD.0000000000001495
Abstrakt:	Objectives: In hearing assessment, the term interaural attenuation (IAA) is used to quantify the reduction in test signal intensity as it crosses from the side of the test ear to the nontest ear. In the auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing of infants and young children, the size of the IAA of bone-conducted (BC) stimuli is essential for the appropriate use of masking, which is needed for the accurate measurement of BC ABR thresholds. This study aimed to assess the IAA for BC ABR testing using 0.5 to 4 kHz narrowband (NB) CE-chirp LS stimuli in infants and toddlers with normal hearing from birth to three years of age and to examine the effects of age and frequency on IAA. Design: A total of 55 infants and toddlers with normal hearing participated in the study. They were categorized into three age groups: the young group (n = 31, infants from birth to 3 mo), middle-aged group (n = 13, infants aged 3-12 mo), and older group (n = 11, toddlers aged 12-36 mo). The participants underwent BC ABR threshold measurements for NB CE-chirp LS stimuli at 0.5 to 4 kHz. For each participant, one ear was randomly defined as the "test ear" and the other as the "nontest ear." BC ABR thresholds were measured under two conditions. In both conditions, traces were recorded from the channel ipsilateral to the test ear, whereas masking was delivered to the nontest ear. In condition A, the bone oscillator was placed on the mastoid of the test ear, whereas in condition B, the bone oscillator was placed on the mastoid contralateral to the test ear. The difference between the thresholds obtained under conditions A and B was calculated to assess IAA. Results: The means of IAA (and range) in the young age group for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were 5.38 (0-15) dB, 11.67 (0-30) dB, 21.15 (10-40) dB, and 23.53 (15-35) dB, respectively. Significant effects were observed for both age and frequency on BC IAA. BC IAA levels decreased with age from birth to 36 mo. In all age groups, smaller values were observed at lower frequencies and increased values were observed at higher frequencies. Conclusions: BC IAA levels were both age and frequency dependent. The study found that the BC IAA values for lower stimulus frequencies were smaller than previously assumed, even in infants younger than 3 mo. These results suggest that masking should be applied in BC ABR threshold assessments for NB CE-chirp LS stimuli at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz, even in young infants. Masking may not be necessary for testing at 4 kHz if a clear response is obtained at 15 dB normal-hearing level (nHL) in infants younger than 3 mo. Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu