Brain Functional Connectivity and Anatomical Features as Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome for Anxiety in Youths.

Autor:	Zugman A; Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Ringlein GV; Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Finn ES; Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 3 Maynard St, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA., Lewis KM; Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Berman E; Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Silverman WK; Child Study Center, Yale University, 230 South Frontage Rd., New Haven, CT 06520, USA., Lebowitz ER; Child Study Center, Yale University, 230 South Frontage Rd., New Haven, CT 06520, USA., Pine DS; Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Winkler AM; Division of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 1 West University Blvd, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	MedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences [medRxiv] 2024 Jan 30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 30.
DOI:	10.1101/2024.01.29.24301959
Abstrakt:	Background: Because pediatric anxiety disorders precede the onset of many other problems, successful prediction of response to the first-line treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could have major impact. However, existing clinical models are weakly predictive. The current study evaluates whether structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can predict post-CBT anxiety symptoms. Methods: Two datasets were studied: (A) one consisted of n=54 subjects with an anxiety diagnosis, who received 12 weeks of CBT, and (B) one consisted of n=15 subjects treated for 8 weeks. Connectome Predictive Modeling (CPM) was used to predict treatment response, as assessed with the PARS; additionally we investigated models using anatomical features, instead of functional connectivity. The main analysis included network edges positively correlated with treatment outcome, and age, sex, and baseline anxiety severity as predictors. Results from alternative models and analyses also are presented. Model assessments utilized 1000 bootstraps, resulting in a 95% CI for R 2 , r and mean absolute error (MAE). Outcomes: The main model showed a mean absolute error of approximately 3.5 (95%CI: [3.1-3.8]) points a R 2 of 0.08 [-0.14 - 0.26] and r of 0.38 [0.24 - 0.511]. When testing this model in the left-out sample (B) the results were similar, with a MAE of 3.4 [2.8 - 4.7], R 2 -0.65 [-2.29 - 0.16] and r of 0.4 [0.24 - 0.54]. The anatomical metrics showed a similar pattern, where models rendered overall low R 2 . Interpretation: The analysis showed that models based on earlier promising results failed to predict clinical outcomes. Despite the small sample size, the current study does not support extensive use of CPM to predict outcome in pediatric anxiety.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu