Retro-mode imaging for the diagnosis of optic disc drusen: a case series.

Autor: Lopez JM; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France; Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: drlopezjuan@gmail.com., Rabinovich M; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Mehanna CJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Ricciotti G; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Crincoli E; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Semoun O; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Miere A; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France., Souied EH; Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia [Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed)] 2024 May; Vol. 99 (5), pp. 187-194. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 09.
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2024.02.001
Abstrakt: Objective: We aimed to compare the detectability of optic disc drusen (ODD), using various non-invasive imaging techniques, including the novel retro-mode imaging (RMI), as well as to analyze the morphological characteristics of ODD on RMI.
Methods: This study involved seven patients with bilateral ODD, totaling 14 eyes. Multimodal imaging techniques, including multicolor fundus photography (MC), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), green and blue light fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF and B-FAF, respectively), and RMI were used to examine the eyes. FAF was used as the primary method of identifying ODD, and each method's detection rate was compared by two observers. Quantitative measurements of ODD included the number of ODD visualized by the RMI technique, the perimeter (P) and area (A) of ODD were identified.
Results: The average age of the patients included was 49.28 ± 23.16 years, with five of the seven being men. RMI was able to detect ODD in all cases, with a sensitivity of 100%, compared to MC (sensitivity 60.71%), NIR (sensitivity 60.71%), B-FAF (sensitivity 100%), G-FAF (sensitivity 100%). RMI was the only imaging technique capable of assessing ODD morphology and quantifying ODD.
Conclusions: RMI is a promising imaging modality for diagnosing superficial ODD, providing valuable information on the distribution, location, and size of ODD. We suggest the incorporation of RMI as a complementary tool for diagnosing and monitoring ODD in combination with other multimodal imaging methods.
(Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE