Estimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveys.

Autor: Korman M; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. maria.korman@ariel.ac.il., Zarina D; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel., Tkachev V; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel., Merikanto I; SleepWell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.; Orton Orthopaedics Hospital, Helsinki, Finland., Bjorvatn B; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.; Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway., Bjelajac AK; Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia., Penzel T; Sleep Medicine Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Landtblom AM; Department of Medical Sciences, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden., Benedict C; Department of Pharmaceutical, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden., Chan NY; Li Chiu Kong Family Sleep Assessment Unit, Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China., Wing YK; Li Chiu Kong Family Sleep Assessment Unit, Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China., Dauvilliers Y; Sleep-Wake Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Gui-de-Chauliac Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM Institute of Neurosciences of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France., Morin CM; Centre de Recherche CERVO/Brain Research Center, École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada., Matsui K; Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaia, Japan., Nadorff M; Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA., Bolstad CJ; Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA., Chung F; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada., Mota-Rolim S; Brain Institute, Physiology and Behavior Department and Onofre Lopes University Hospital, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil., De Gennaro L; Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Lazio, Italy.; IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy., Plazzi G; Irccs Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy., Yordanova J; Institute of Neurobiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria., Holzinger B; Institute for Consciousness and Dream Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Partinen M; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki Clinicum Unit, Helsinki, Finland.; Helsinki Sleep Clinic, Terveystalo Healthcare Services, Helsinki, Finland., Reis C; Católica Research Centre for Psychological - Family and Social Welbeing, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal. catia.reis@medicina.ulisboa.pt.; Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. catia.reis@medicina.ulisboa.pt.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 Feb 10; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 3420. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 10.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53174-1
Abstrakt: Accurate measurement of habitual sleep duration (HSD) is crucial for understanding the relationship between sleep and health. This study aimed to assess the bias and agreement limits between two commonly used short HSD self-report methods, considering sleep quality (SQ) and social jetlag (SJL) as potential predictors of bias. Data from 10,268 participants in the International COVID Sleep Study-II (ICOSS-II) were used. Method-Self and Method-MCTQ were compared. Method-Self involved a single question about average nightly sleep duration (HSD self ), while Method-MCTQ estimated HSD from reported sleep times on workdays (HSD MCTQwork ) and free days (HSD MCTQfree ). Sleep quality was evaluated using a Likert scale and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to explore its influence on estimation bias. HSD self was on average 42.41 ± 67.42 min lower than HSD MCTQweek , with an agreement range within ± 133 min. The bias and agreement range between methods increased with poorer SQ. HSD MCTQwork showed less bias and better agreement with HSD self compared to HSD MCTQfree . Sleep duration irregularity was - 43.35 ± 78.26 min on average. Subjective sleep quality predicted a significant proportion of variance in HSD self and estimation bias. The two methods showed very poor agreement and a significant systematic bias, both worsening with poorer SQ. Method-MCTQ considered sleep intervals without adjusting for SQ issues such as wakefulness after sleep onset but accounted for sleep irregularity and sleeping in on free days, while Method-Self reflected respondents' interpretation of their sleep, focusing on their sleep on workdays. Including an SQ-related question in surveys may help bidirectionally adjust the possible bias and enhance the accuracy of sleep-health studies.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: