Validation of the EDDS-5 self-report survey against the SCID-5 diagnostic interview in US veterans.

Autor: Maguen S; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: Shira.Maguen@va.gov., Batten A; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA., Siegel SE; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA., Huggins J; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA., Snow JL; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, USA., Fenn LM; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, USA., Dick AM; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA., Zenteno C; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA., West AC; San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA., Masheb RM; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, USA; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Eating behaviors [Eat Behav] 2024 Jan; Vol. 52, pp. 101846. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 23.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101846
Abstrakt: The aim of our study was to validate the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS-5) updated for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) with a diverse veteran population against a clinician-administered interview based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Our sample included 343 veterans, 18-75 years, recruited April 2019 to December 2022 who completed the EDDS-5 as well as other eating disorder and mental health measures. A subsample of these veterans received clinical interviews (n = 166), which were used to validate the EDDS-5. We found that despite multiple proposed modifications, the EDDS-5 performed poorly at correctly identifying diverse veterans who were diagnosed as having eating disorders through clinician-administered interviews. The sensitivity was very low, indicating that using the EDDS-5 did not identify many true positives and may also over diagnose those without true eating disorders. The EDDS-5 may not be the best for screening or diagnostic purposes among diverse samples like veterans.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to report.
(Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE