Glioblastoma epigenomics discloses a complex biology and potential therapeutic targets.

Autor: Krabóth Z; Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs., Tompa M; Szentágothai Research Center, Genomic and Bioinformatic Core Facility, Pécs., Urbán P; Szentágothai Research Center, Genomic and Bioinformatic Core Facility, Pécs., Gálik B; Szentágothai Research Center, Genomic and Bioinformatic Core Facility, Pécs., Kajtár B; Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs.; Szentágothai Research Center, Genomic and Bioinformatic Core Facility, Pécs., Gyenesei A; Szentágothai Research Center, Genomic and Bioinformatic Core Facility, Pécs., Kálmán B; Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Ideggyogyaszati szemle [Ideggyogy Sz] 2024 Jan 30; Vol. 77 (1-2), pp. 27-37.
DOI: 10.18071/isz.77.0027
Abstrakt: Background and Purpose:

Glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive form of brain tumors, has been extensively studied using OMICS methods, and the most characteristic molecular determinants have been incorporated into the histopathological diagnosis. Research data, nevertheless, only partially have been adopted in clinical practice. Here we aimed to present results of our epige­no­mic GBM profiling to better understand early and late determinants of these tumors, and to share main elements of our findings with practicing professionals.

.
Methods:

GBM specimens were surgically obtained after first diagnosis (GBM1) and at recurrence (GBM2). DNA was extracted from 24 sequential pairs of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. The Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing kit was used for library preparation. Pooled libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 550 instrument. Methylation controls (MC) were obtained from a publicly available database. Bioinformatic analyses were performed to identify differentially methylated pathways and their elements in cohorts of MC, GBM1 and GBM2.

.
Results:

Several differentially methylated pathways involved in basic intracellular and brain tissue developmental processes were identified in the GBM1 vs. MC and GBM2 vs. MC comparisons. Among differentially me­thylated pathways, those involved in immune regulation, neurotransmitter (particularly dopaminergic, noradrenergic and glutaminergic) responses and regulation of stem cell differentiation and proliferation stood out in the GBM2 vs. GBM1 comparisons.

.
Conclusion:

Our study revealed biological complexity of early and late gliomagenesis encompassing mechanisms from basic intracellular through distorted neurodevelopmental processes to more specific immune and highjacked neurotransmitter pathways in the tumor microenvironment. These findings may offer considerations for therapeutic approaches.

.
Databáze: MEDLINE