Comparing AGS Beers 2019, STOPP version 2, and EU(7)-PIM list in Portuguese older adults in primary health care.

Autor: Rodrigues DA; Research Laboratory on Epidemiology and Population Health, Polytechnic of Guarda (IPG), 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal.; Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.; PhD Student, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain., Herdeiro MT; Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal., Mateos-Campos R; Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain., Figueiras A; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15702, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.; Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health-CIBERESP), 28001, Madrid, Spain., Roque F; Research Laboratory on Epidemiology and Population Health, Polytechnic of Guarda (IPG), 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal. froque@ipg.pt.; Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal. froque@ipg.pt.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: European journal of clinical pharmacology [Eur J Clin Pharmacol] 2024 Apr; Vol. 80 (4), pp. 603-612. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 06.
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03633-5
Abstrakt: Purpose: This study aims to identify PIM prevalence in older adults according to the 2019 Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions version 2 (STOPP v2) criteria, and the Portuguese EU(7)-PIM list and also to analyze the concordance between these criteria.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 1200 Portuguese older adults (≥ 65 years old), users of primary health care. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data were collected concerning the period between April 2021 and August 2022. A comparative analysis was performed between the three PIM identification criteria, and the concordance was determined according to the Lin concordance correlation coefficient.
Results: The mean age was 76.3 (SD 7.7) years old and 57.6% of the older adults were females. Our findings indicate varying prevalence rates among these criteria with 63.8% (95% CI 61.0-66.6%), 66.8% (95% CI 64.1-69.5%), and 50.1% (95% CI 47.2-53.0%) of the older adults take at least one PIM according to the EU(7)-PIM list, Beers 2019, and STOPP v2 criteria, respectively. The highest prevalence observed was for proton pump inhibitors according to EU(7)-PIM list (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6-32.9) and Beers criteria (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6-32.9) and alprazolam according to STOPP v2 criteria (10.1%, 95% CI 8.4-11.9%). A poor concordance between criteria was observed (< 0.834). The highest concordance coefficient was found between the EU(7)-PIM list and the Beers criteria (0.833), and the lowest between the EU(7)-PIM list and STOPP criteria (0.735).
Conclusion: This study reveals varying prevalence rates of PIM in older adults, as assessed by different criteria, and highlights the need for targeted interventions and improved prescribing practices. In the future, studies should focus on the occurrence of negative outcomes in older adults associated with PIM consumption.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE