Representativeness of the US EPA PM monitoring site locations to the US population: implications for air pollution prediction modeling.

Autor: Pedde M; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. mpedde@umich.edu., Adar SD; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology [J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol] 2024 Sep; Vol. 34 (5), pp. 821-826. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 06.
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-024-00644-3
Abstrakt: Air pollution prediction modeling establishes relationships between measurements and geographical and meteorological characteristics to infer concentrations at locations without measurements. Since air pollution monitors are limited in number, predictions may be generated for locations different than those used to train the model. The epidemiologic impacts of this potential mismatch hinge on whether the population resides in areas well-represented by monitoring sites. Here we quantify the fraction of the population with geographical characteristics not reflected by the 2000, 2010, and 2020 EPA PM 2.5 and PM 10 regulatory sites. We evaluated this measure nationwide, regionally, and by race. Nationally, the networks were very representative of the population experience; however, there was less overlap regionally and in regions stratified by race. This suggests that sub-national exposure modeling should carefully consider the representativeness of monitors for their populations. It also highlights that exposure models often borrow information from distal places to predict full population exposure.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)
Databáze: MEDLINE