| Autor: |
Nallakaruppan MK; School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu 632014, India., Chowdhary CL; School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu 632014, India., Somayaji S; School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu 632014, India., Chaturvedi H; School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu 632014, India., R S; School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu 632014, India., Rauf HT; Centre for Smart Systems, AI and Cybersecurity, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK., Sharaf M; Industrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia. |
| Abstrakt: |
Fake face identity is a serious, potentially fatal issue that affects every industry from the banking and finance industry to the military and mission-critical applications. This is where the proposed system offers artificial intelligence (AI)-based supported fake face detection. The models were trained on an extensive dataset of real and fake face images, incorporating steps like sampling, preprocessing, pooling, normalization, vectorization, batch processing and model training, testing-, and classification via output activation. The proposed work performs the comparative analysis of the three fusion models, which can be integrated with Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) based on the performance evaluation. The Model-3, which contains the combination of DenseNet-201+ResNet-102+Xception, offers the highest accuracy of 0.9797, and the Model-2 with the combination of DenseNet-201+ResNet-50+Inception V3 offers the lowest loss value of 0.1146; both are suitable for the GAN integration. Additionally, the Model-1 performs admirably, with an accuracy of 0.9542 and a loss value of 0.1416. A second dataset was also tested where the proposed Model-3 provided maximum accuracy of 86.42% with a minimum loss of 0.4054. |
