From wolves to humans: oral microbiome resistance to transfer across mammalian hosts.
Autor: | Podar NA; School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA., Carrell AA; Biosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA., Cassidy KA; Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA., Klingeman DM; Biosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA., Yang Z; Biosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA., Stahler EA; Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA., Smith DW; Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA., Stahler DR; Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA., Podar M; Biosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | MBio [mBio] 2024 Mar 13; Vol. 15 (3), pp. e0334223. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 01. |
DOI: | 10.1128/mbio.03342-23 |
Abstrakt: | The mammalian mouth is colonized by complex microbial communities, adapted to specific niches, and in homeostasis with the host. Individual microbes interact metabolically and rely primarily on nutrients provided by the host, with which they have potentially co-evolved along the mammalian lineages. The oral environment is similar across mammals, but the diversity, specificity, and evolution of community structure in related or interacting mammals are little understood. Here, we compared the oral microbiomes of dogs with those of wild wolves and humans. In dogs, we found an increased microbial diversity relative to wolves, possibly related to the transition to omnivorous nutrition following domestication. This includes a larger diversity of Patescibacteria than previously reported in any other oral microbiota. The oral microbes are most distinct at bacterial species or strain levels, with few if any shared between humans and canids, while the close evolutionary relationship between wolves and dogs is reflected by numerous shared taxa. More taxa are shared at higher taxonomic levels including with humans, supporting their more ancestral common mammalian colonization followed by diversification. Phylogenies of selected oral bacterial lineages do not support stable human-dog microbial transfers but suggest diversification along mammalian lineages (apes and canids). Therefore, despite millennia of cohabitation and close interaction, the host and its native community controls and limits the assimilation of new microbes, even if closely related. Higher resolution metagenomic and microbial physiological studies, covering a larger mammalian diversity, should help understand how oral communities assemble, adapt, and interact with their hosts.IMPORTANCENumerous types of microbes colonize the mouth after birth and play important roles in maintaining oral health. When the microbiota-host homeostasis is perturbed, proliferation of some bacteria leads to diseases such as caries and periodontitis. Unlike the gut microbiome, the diversity of oral microbes across the mammalian evolutionary space is not understood. Our study compared the oral microbiomes of wild wolves, dogs, and apes (humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos), with the aim of identifying if microbes have been potentially exchanged between humans and dogs as a result of domestication and cohabitation. We found little if any evidence for such exchanges. The significance of our research is in finding that the oral microbiota and/or the host limit the acquisition of exogenous microbes, which is important in the context of natural exclusion of potential novel pathogens. We provide a framework for expanded higher-resolution studies across domestic and wild animals to understand resistance/resilience. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |