[Impact of a multidisciplinary team "ECMO Team" on the prognosis of patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest].
Autor: | Seoane LA; Servicio de Cardiología Crítica, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Cardiología Crítica Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Burgos L; Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular Buenos Aires Argentina., Vila RB; Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular Buenos Aires Argentina., Furmento JF; Servicio de Cardiología Crítica, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Cardiología Crítica Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Costabel JP; Servicio de Cardiología Crítica, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Cardiología Crítica Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Vrancic M; Servicio de Cirugía cardiovascular, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Cirugía cardiovascular ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Villagra M; Servicio de Ultrasonido, Departamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen. ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos AiresArgentina. Servicio de Ultrasonido Departamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Ramírez-Hoyos OD; Sección de Perfusión, Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sección de Perfusión Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Navia D; Servicio de Cirugía cardiovascular, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Cirugía cardiovascular ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina., Diez M; Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca, Departamento de Cardiología, ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sección de Insuficiencia Cardíaca Departamento de Cardiología ICBA Instituto Cardiovascular Buenos Aires Argentina. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | Spanish; Castilian |
Zdroj: | Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular [Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc] 2023 Dec 27; Vol. 4 (4), pp. 132-140. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 27 (Print Publication: 2023). |
DOI: | 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i4.325 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: Veno-arterial Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a salvage intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and cardiac arrest (CA) refractory to standard therapies. The design of ECMO Teams has achieved the standardization of processes, although its impact on survival and prognosis is unknown. Objective: We aimed to analyze whether the creation of an ECMO Team has modified the prognosis of patients undergoing VA ECMO for refractory CS or CA. Materials and Methods: . We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with refractory CS or CA who underwent VA ECMO were divided in two consecutive periods: from 2014 to April 2019 (pre-ECMO T) and from May 2019 to December 2022 (Post ECMO T). The main outcomes were survival on ECMO, in-hospital survival, complications, and annual ECMO volume. Results: Eighty-three patients were included (36 pre-ECMO T and 47 post-ECMO T). The mean age was 53 +/-13 years. The most common reason for device indication was different: postcardiotomy shock (47.2%) pre-ECMO T and refractory cardiogenic shock (29.7%) post-ECMO T. The rate of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 14.5%. The median duration of VA ECMO was longer after ECMO team implementation: 8 days (IQR 5-12.5) vs. five days (IQR 2-9, p=0.04). Global in-hospital survival was 45.8% (38.9% pre-ECMO T vs. 51.1% post-ECMO T; p=0.37), and the survival rate from VA ECMO was 60.2% (55.6% pre-ECMO T vs 63.8% post-ECMO T; p= 0.50). The volume of VA ECMO implantation was significantly higher in the post-ECMO team period (13.2 +/3.5 per year vs. 6.5 +/-3.5 per year, p: 0.02). The rate of complications was similar in both groups. Conclusions: After the implementation of an ECMO team, there was no statistical difference in the survival rate of patients treated with VA ECMO. However, a significant increase in the number of patients supported per year was observed after the implementation of this multidisciplinary team. Post-ECMO T, the most common reason for device indication was cardiogenic shock, with longer run times and a higher rate of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Competing Interests: Conflictos de interés Ninguno |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |