How did European countries set health priorities in response to the COVID-19 threat? A comparative document analysis of 24 pandemic preparedness plans across the EURO region.
Autor: | Williams I; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham Park house, 40 Edgbaston Park Rd Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK. Electronic address: i.p.williams@bham.ac.uk., Kapiriri L; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada., Vélez CM; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada., Aguilera B; Faculty of Medicine and Science at the Universidad San Sebastian, Providencia, Santiago de Chile, Región Metropolitana, Chile., Danis M; Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20812, USA., Essue B; Centre for Global Health Research, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada., Goold S; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road Building 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA., Noorulhuda M; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada., Nouvet E; School of Health Studies, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada., Razavi D; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada., Sandman L; National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Health Policy] 2024 Mar; Vol. 141, pp. 104998. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 19. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104998 |
Abstrakt: | The COVID-19 pandemic has forced governments across the world to consider how to prioritise the allocation of scarce resources. There are many tools and frameworks that have been designed to assist with the challenges of priority setting in health care. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which formal priority setting was evident in the pandemic plans produced by countries in the World Health Organisation's EURO region, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This compliments analysis of similar plans produced in other regions of the world. Twenty four pandemic preparedness plans were obtained that had been published between March and September 2020. For data extraction, we applied a framework for identifying and assessing the elements of good priority setting to each plan, before conducting comparative analysis across the sample. Our findings suggest that while some pre-requisites for effective priority setting were present in many cases - including political commitment and a recognition of the need for allocation decisions - many other hallmarks were less evident, such as explicit ethical criteria, decision making frameworks, and engagement processes. This study provides a unique insight into the role of priority setting in the European response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We have no conflicts of interest to report. (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |