Evidence-based data for newly approved medications' use in older adults: An analysis from clinical trials to monographs.

Autor: Gosselin M; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada., Baroud ML; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada., Denis OR; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada., Gagnon ME; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Quebec, Canada., Sirois C; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.; Centre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.; VITAM, Sustainable Health Research Centre, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.; CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [J Am Geriatr Soc] 2024 Apr; Vol. 72 (4), pp. 1252-1262. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 25.
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18772
Abstrakt: Background: Older adults have historically been excluded from clinical trials, limiting evidence-based data. An updated picture of the situation with newly marketed medications is needed. We aimed to describe (1) the recommendations specific to older adults in monographs of newly marketed medications; (2) the representation of older adults in clinical trials of those medications.
Methods: In November 2020, we listed all medications that received a notice of compliance from Health Canada between January 2006 and September 2020, excluding those with indications irrelevant to community-dwelling older adults and locally acting medications. We assessed the availability and clarity of recommendations in monographs regarding older adults. Using Clinicaltrials.gov, we identified randomized controlled double-blind Phase III-IV trials led in Canada/United States of a sample of 30 commonly used medications among those previously listed. We extracted information on study design, participants, and efficacy/safety analysis specific to older patients. We used simple linear regression and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests to analyze time trends in the representation of older adults over different periods.
Results: A total of 195 monographs were included. Of the 130 monographs reporting a dosing recommendation in older adults, 53 (41%) also reported limited/insufficient data in this population or its subgroups. Of the 373 trials included, 217 (58%) did not integrate a maximum age as an inclusion criterion. However, only 113 (30%) reported including a proportion of older adults representative (or over-representative) of the Canadian older population. Most trials (n = 289; 78%) did not provide efficacy or safety data specific to older adults. In our sample, the number/proportion of older adults in trials seemed to be increasingly reported over time, either explicitly or implicitly (e.g., inclusion criterion specifies <65 years old).
Conclusions: Newly marketed medications still appear to under-represent older adults. The resulting lack of clear recommendations in monographs compromises evidence-based practice, thereby perpetuating the risk to older adults' health.
(© 2024 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: