| Autor: |
Junkins A; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Kempf MC; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Burkholder G; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Ye Y; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Chu DI; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Wiener HW; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Szychowski JM; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA., Shrestha S; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
ABSTRACT Without standard guidelines, there is a critical need to examine anal cancer screening uptake in the South which has the highest HIV incidence in the U.S. We identified factors associated with screening among men living with HIV (MLHIV) at a large academic HIV outpatient clinic in Alabama. Relationships between sociodemographic, clinical, sexual risk characteristics and screening were examined using T-tests, Fisher's exact, Chi-square, and logistic regression analyses. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were computed to estimate the odds of screening. Among 1,114 men, 52% had received annual anal cytology (pap) screening. Men who were screened were more likely to have multiple sexual partners compared to men who were not screened (22.8% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.002). Among men with one partner, the youngest were almost five times more likely to be screened compared to middle-aged men (AOR = 4.93, 95% CI: 2.34-10.39). Heterosexual men had lower odds and men who reported unprotected anal sex had higher odds of screening. Our findings suggest a racial disparity, with older black MLHIV being the least likely to be screened. In the South, MLHIV who are older, black, heterosexual, or live in high social vulnerability counties may be less likely to receive annual anal cancer screening. |
