Judgment Errors in Surgical Care.
Autor: | Marsh KM; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Turrentine FE; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Jin R; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Schirmer BD; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Hanks JB; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Davis JP; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Schenk WG; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., Jones RS; From the Departments of Surgery (Marsh, Turrentine, Schirmer, Hanks, Davis, Schenk, Jones), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Surgeons [J Am Coll Surg] 2024 May 01; Vol. 238 (5), pp. 874-879. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17. |
DOI: | 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001011 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Human error is impossible to eliminate, particularly in systems as complex as healthcare. The extent to which judgment errors in particular impact surgical patient care or lead to harm is unclear. Study Design: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP (2018) procedures from a single institution with 30-day morbidity or mortality were examined. Medical records were reviewed and evaluated for judgment errors. Preoperative variables associated with judgment errors were examined using logistic regression. Results: Of the surgical patients who experienced a morbidity or mortality, 18% (31 of 170) experienced an error in judgment during their hospitalization. Patients with hepatobiliary procedure (odds ratio [OR] 5.4 [95% CI 1.23 to 32.75], p = 0.002), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 4.8 [95% CI 1.2 to 18.8], p = 0.025), severe COPD (OR 6.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 22.1], p = 0.007), or with infected wounds (OR 8.2 [95% CI 2.6 to 25.8], p < 0.001) were at increased risk for judgment errors. Conclusions: Specific procedure types and patients with certain preoperative variables had higher risk for judgment errors during their hospitalization. Errors in judgment adversely impacted the outcomes of surgical patients who experienced morbidity or mortality in this cohort. Preventing or mitigating errors and closely monitoring patients after an error in judgment is prudent and may improve surgical safety. (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |