Predicting histological grade in symptomatic meningioma by an objective estimation of the tumoral surface irregularity.
Autor: | Delgado-López PD; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain. Electronic address: pedrodl@yahoo.com., Montalvo-Afonso A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Martín-Alonso J; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Martín-Velasco V; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Diana-Martín R; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Castilla-Díez JM; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Neurocirugia (English Edition) [Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed)] 2024 May-Jun; Vol. 35 (3), pp. 113-121. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 18. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neucie.2023.10.002 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II-III compared to WHO grade I tumours, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumours are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumour surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade. Methods: Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the Surface Factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumour against the actual surface of the tumour. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis. Results: A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II-III tumours (0.8651 ± 0.049 versus 0.7081 ± 0.105, p < 0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade. Conclusion: The Surface Factor is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II-III with high precision. (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |