Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study.

Autor: Miletić I; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia. miletic@sfzg.hr., Baraba A; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia., Krmek SJ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia., Perić T; Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 11, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia., Marković D; Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 11, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia., Basso M; Center of Minimally Invasive, Aesthetic and Digital Oral Rehabilitation (CROMED), IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, University of Milan, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy., Ozkaya CA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ege University School of Dentistry, Erzene Mah. Ankara Cad. No:172/109, 35040, Bornova/Izmir, Turkey., Kemaloglu H; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ege University School of Dentistry, Erzene Mah. Ankara Cad. No:172/109, 35040, Bornova/Izmir, Turkey., Turkun LS; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ege University School of Dentistry, Erzene Mah. Ankara Cad. No:172/109, 35040, Bornova/Izmir, Turkey.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 Jan 20; Vol. 28 (1), pp. 104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 20.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
Abstrakt: Objective: To evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system and a nano-hybrid resin composite in moderate to large two-surface class II cavities.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out by dental schools in Zagreb, Croatia; Izmir, Turkey; Belgrade, Serbia; and Milan, Italy. A total of 180 patients requiring two class-II two-surface restorations in the molars of the same jaw were recruited. The teeth were randomly restored with either a nano-hybrid resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) or a glass-hybrid material (EQUIA Forte, GC). During the 5-year follow-up, two calibrated evaluators at each centre scored the restorations annually using the FDI-2 scoring system. The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using non-parametric matched pair tests (p < 0.05).
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the overall survival and success rates of the two types of restorations (p>0.05). The success rates (FDI-2 scores 1-3) for EQUIA Forte were 81.9% (average annual failure rate: 3.9%) and 90.7% for Tetric EvoCeram (average annual failure rate: 1.9%). The survival rates (FDI-2 scores 1-4) for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram were 94.5% and 94.4%, respectively, with an average annual failure rate of 1.1%.
Conclusions: In terms of success and survival rates, both the glass-hybrid restorative system and the nano-hybrid resin composite have been shown to perform satisfactorily.
Clinical Relevance: The results of this study indicate that EQUIA Forte can be one of the therapeutic options for moderate to large two-surface class II restorations of posterior teeth.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: