Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Autor: Janczak J; Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland., Ukegjini K; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland., Bischofberger S; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland., Turina M; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland., Müller PC; Department of Surgery, Clarunis-University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland., Steffen T; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Cancers [Cancers (Basel)] 2023 Dec 20; Vol. 16 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 20.
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026
Abstrakt: Introduction: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time.
Methods: Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data.
Results: A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles).
Conclusion: Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje