Ecological filtering shapes the impacts of agricultural deforestation on biodiversity.

Autor: Hua F; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. fhua@pku.edu.cn., Wang W; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.; School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia., Nakagawa S; Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Liu S; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China., Miao X; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.; Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia., Yu L; Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.; Ministry of Education Ecological Field Station for East Asia Migratory Birds, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.; Tsinghua University (Department of Earth System Science)-Xi'an Institute of Surveying and Mapping Joint Research Center for Next-Generation Smart Mapping, Beijing, China., Du Z; Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China., Abrahamczyk S; Department of Botany, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany., Arias-Sosa LA; Laboratorio de Ecología de Organismos (GEO-UPTC), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia., Buda K; Department of Behavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland., Budka M; Department of Behavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland., Carrière SM; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR SENS, IRD, CIRAD, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France., Chandler RB; Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA., Chiatante G; Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy., Chiawo DO; Centre for Biodiversity Information Development, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya., Cresswell W; Centre of Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland., Echeverri A; Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA., Goodale E; Department of Health and Environmental Science, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China., Huang G; School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia., Hulme MF; Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.; British Trust for Ornithology, Norfolk, UK., Hutto RL; Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA., Imboma TS; Ornithology Section, Zoology Department, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya., Jarrett C; Department of Bird Migration, Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland., Jiang Z; Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.; College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China., Kati VI; Department of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece., King DI; Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Amherst, MA, USA., Kmecl P; Group for Conservation Biology, DOPPS BirdLife Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia., Li N; Institute of Eastern-Himalaya Biodiversity Research, Dali University, Dali, China., Lövei GL; Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian University of Agriculture and Forestry, Fuzhou, China.; HUN-REN-DE Anthropocene Ecology Research Group, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary., Macchi L; Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina., MacGregor-Fors I; Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland., Martin EA; Institute of Animal Ecology and Systematic Zoology, Justus Liebig University of Gießen, Giessen, Germany., Mira A; MED (Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development), CHANGE (Global Change and Sustainability Institute) and UBC (Conservation Biology Lab), Department of Biology, School of Sciences and Technology, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Morelli F; Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK., Ortega-Álvarez R; Investigadoras e Investigadores por México del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Dirección Regional Occidente, Mexico City, Mexico., Quan RC; Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, China., Salgueiro PA; MED (Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development), CHANGE (Global Change and Sustainability Institute), Institute for Advanced Studies and Research and UBC (Conservation Biology Lab), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Santos SM; MED (Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development), CHANGE (Global Change and Sustainability Institute), Institute for Advanced Studies and Research and UBC (Conservation Biology Lab), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Shahabuddin G; Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, India., Socolar JB; NCX, San Francisco, CA, USA., Soh MCK; National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore., Sreekar R; Centre for Nature-based Climate Solutions, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore., Srinivasan U; Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India., Wilcove DS; School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA., Yamaura Y; Shikoku Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Kochi, Japan., Zhou L; Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China., Elsen PR; Global Conservation Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Nature ecology & evolution [Nat Ecol Evol] 2024 Feb; Vol. 8 (2), pp. 251-266. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 05.
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02280-w
Abstrakt: The biodiversity impacts of agricultural deforestation vary widely across regions. Previous efforts to explain this variation have focused exclusively on the landscape features and management regimes of agricultural systems, neglecting the potentially critical role of ecological filtering in shaping deforestation tolerance of extant species assemblages at large geographical scales via selection for functional traits. Here we provide a large-scale test of this role using a global database of species abundance ratios between matched agricultural and native forest sites that comprises 71 avian assemblages reported in 44 primary studies, and a companion database of 10 functional traits for all 2,647 species involved. Using meta-analytic, phylogenetic and multivariate methods, we show that beyond agricultural features, filtering by the extent of natural environmental variability and the severity of historical anthropogenic deforestation shapes the varying deforestation impacts across species assemblages. For assemblages under greater environmental variability-proxied by drier and more seasonal climates under a greater disturbance regime-and longer deforestation histories, filtering has attenuated the negative impacts of current deforestation by selecting for functional traits linked to stronger deforestation tolerance. Our study provides a previously largely missing piece of knowledge in understanding and managing the biodiversity consequences of deforestation by agricultural deforestation.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: