A prospective study on tumour response assessment methods after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Autor: | López-Velazco JI; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Manzano S; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Otaño M; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Elorriaga K; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Bultó N; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Herrero J; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Lahuerta A; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain.; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Segur V; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Álvarez-López I; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain.; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain., Caffarel MM; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain. MARIA.MUNOZCAFFAREL@biodonostia.org.; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain. MARIA.MUNOZCAFFAREL@biodonostia.org., Urruticoechea A; Biogipuzkoa (Previously Known As Biodonostia) Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr Begiristain S/N, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain. aurruticoechea@onkologikoa.org.; Gipuzkoa Cancer Unit, OSI Donostialdea - Onkologikoa Foundation, Paseo Dr Begiristain 121, 20014, San Sebastian, Spain. aurruticoechea@onkologikoa.org. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Breast cancer research : BCR [Breast Cancer Res] 2024 Jan 03; Vol. 26 (1), pp. 3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 03. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13058-023-01756-8 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) /HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer allows real-time evaluation of drug efficacy as well as investigation of the biological and molecular changes that occur after estrogenic deprivation. Clinical and pathological evaluation after NET may be used to obtain prognostic and predictive information of tumour response to decide adjuvant treatment. In this setting, clinical scales developed to evaluate response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not useful and there are not validated biomarkers to assess response to NET beyond Ki67 levels and preoperative endocrine prognostic index score (mPEPI). Methods: In this prospective study, we extensively analysed radiological (by ultrasound scan (USS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and pathological tumour response of 104 postmenopausal patients with ER+ /HER2- resectable breast cancer, treated with NET for a mean of 7 months prior to surgery. We defined a new score, tumour cellularity size (TCS), calculated as the product of the residual tumour cellularity in the surgical specimen and the tumour pathological size. Results: Our results show that radiological evaluation of response to NET by both USS and MRI underestimates pathological tumour size (path-TS). Tumour size [mean (range); mm] was: path-TS 20 (0-80); radiological-TS by USS 9 (0-31); by MRI: 12 (0-60). Nevertheless, they support the use of MRI over USS to clinically assess radiological tumour response (rad-TR) due to the statistically significant association of rad-TR by MRI, but not USS, with Ki67 decrease (p = 0.002 and p = 0.3, respectively) and mPEPI score (p = 0.002 and p = 0.6, respectively). In addition, we propose that TCS could become a new tool to standardize response assessment to NET given its simplicity, reproducibility and its good correlation with existing biomarkers (such as ΔKi67, p = 0.001) and potential added value. Conclusion: Our findings shed light on the dynamics of tumour response to NET, challenge the paradigm of the ability of NET to decrease surgical volume and point to the utility of the TCS to quantify the scattered tumour response usually produced by endocrine therapy. In the future, these results should be validated in independent cohorts with associated survival data. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |