External validation of predictive models of sexual, urinary, bowel and hormonal function after surgery in prostate cancer subjects.
Autor: | Borg MA; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. matthew.borg@adelaide.edu.au., O'Callaghan ME; Urology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.; South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.; Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia., Moretti KL; South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Vincent AD; Freemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | BMC urology [BMC Urol] 2024 Jan 02; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 02. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12894-023-01373-9 |
Abstrakt: | Background: In 2020, a research group published five linear longitudinal models, predict Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) scores post-treatment for radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and active surveillance collectively in US patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: Our study externally validates the five prediction models for patient reported outcomes post-surgery for localised prostate cancer. The models' calibration, fit, variance explained and discrimination (concordance-indices) were assessed. Two Australian validation cohorts 1 and 2 years post-prostatectomy were constructed, consisting of 669 and 439 subjects, respectively (750 in total). Patient reported function in five domains post-prostatectomy: sexual, bowel, hormonal, urinary incontinence and other urinary dysfunction (irritation/obstruction). Domain function was assessed using the EPIC-26 questionnaire. Results: 1 year post-surgery, R 2 was highest for the sexual domain (35%, SD = 0.02), lower for the bowel (21%, SD = 0.03) and hormone (15%, SD = 0.03) domains, and close to zero for urinary incontinence (1%, SD = 0.01) and irritation/obstruction (- 5%, SD = 0.04). Calibration slopes for these five models were 1.04 (SD = 0.04), 0.84 (SD = 0.06), 0.85 (SD = 0.06), 1.16 (SD = 0.13) and 0.45 (SD = 0.04), respectively. Calibration-in-the-large values were - 2.2 (SD = 0.6), 2.1 (SD = 0.01), 5.1 (SD = 0.1), 9.6 (SD = 0.9) and 4.0 (SD = 0.2), respectively. Concordance-indices were 0.73, 0.70, 0.70, 0.58 and 0.62, respectively (all had SD = 0.01). Mean absolute error and root mean square error were similar across the validation and development cohorts. The validation measures were largely similar at 2 years post-surgery. Conclusions: The sexual, bowel and hormone domain models validated well and show promise for accurately predicting patient reported outcomes in a non-US surgical population. The urinary domain models validated poorly and may require recalibration or revision. (© 2023. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |