| Autor: |
Maulod A; Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Lee JML; Former researcher, Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Lu SY; Social and Behavioral Health Sciences Division, University of Toronto, Canada., Cheng GHL; Former researcher, Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Chan A; Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Thang LL; Department of Japanese Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Malhotra R; Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore. |
| Abstrakt: |
Studies have shown how generativity, the concern for establishing and guiding the next generation and safeguarding its wellbeing, functions as an intergenerational conduit, bridging the developmental stages of older individuals with those younger. Yet, applications of generativity, as a means to bridge generational gaps within rapid social change, remain underexplored in the intergenerational field. Using Singapore as a case study, and through focus group discussions with 103 older persons, this paper examines how older Singaporeans express their generative concern and internalize their generative capacities across different social settings and rapid socioeconomic transformation. Mismatch between older Singaporeans' generative concern and capacity contributes to ambivalence - mixed feelings about guiding younger generations - which emerges out of older Singaporeans' struggles with cultural change prompted by economic progress, as well as concerns about their place and value in a technologically advanced global city-state. The concept of generative ambivalence can add value to policy perspectives on intergenerational cohesion, as it considers people's attempts to forge commonalities and mutual reciprocity despite differences (e.g. gender, age, race, skills), as well as highlights intergenerational complexities beyond superficial binaries. Policies aimed at bringing generations together must be intentional in creating opportunity structures that go beyond categorical differences, where multiple generations can thrive interdependently. |
