Breast Imaging Fellowship Training in the United States: A National Survey of Fellowship Program Directors.

Autor:	Weinstein JD; Boston Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA., Mehta RJ; Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Department of Radiology, Newton, MA, USA., Mehta TS; Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA., Kavandi H; Waterbury Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Waterbury, CT, USA., Brook A; Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA., Phillips J; Boston Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of breast imaging [J Breast Imaging] 2023 Nov 30; Vol. 5 (6), pp. 724-731.
DOI:	10.1093/jbi/wbad051
Abstrakt:	Objective: To provide an updated characterization of breast imaging fellowship programs in the United States to identify opportunities for improvement and standardization. Methods: An anonymous survey was e-mailed to program directors of breast imaging fellowship programs listed on the Society of Breast Imaging website. The survey was open from April 23, 2021, through May 27, 2021. The survey was deemed exempt by the IRB. Results: Forty-seven of 80 (59%) program directors responded, of which 36/47 (77%) represented programs dedicated 100% to breast imaging, and 11/47 (23%) represented programs dedicated 50%-75% to breast imaging. Common elements to most programs include tumor boards (47/47, 100%), journal clubs (39/47, 83%), case-based teaching sessions (35/47, 74%), didactic lectures (40/47, 85%), and participation in radiology-pathology conferences (29/47, 62%). Mammography Quality and Standards Act audit training (22/47, 47%), mammography quality control training (22/47, 47%), and formal communication training (19/47, 40%) were less common. Most programs provide exposure to wire (42/47, 89%) and wire-free localization procedures (45/47, 96%), but exposure to contrast-enhanced mammography (13/47, 28%) and molecular breast imaging (4/47, 9%) was limited. A small majority of programs (25/47, 53%) do not require weekday call; however, more (31/47, 66%) have weekend call responsibilities. Many programs (29/47, 62%) offer at least 3 weeks of elective time, which may be clinical or nonclinical. Conclusion: Breast imaging fellowship programs vary in curricula, modality exposure, and academic policies. The results of this survey can help guide further efforts to standardize and optimize fellowship training. (© Society of Breast Imaging 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu