Biomarker Qualification for Neurofilament Light Chain in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Theory and Practice.

Autor: Benatar M; Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA., Ostrow LW; Department of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee., Lewcock JW; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.; Denali Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA, USA., Bennett F; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.; Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA, USA., Shefner J; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.; Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Bowser R; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.; Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Larkin P; The ALS Association, Arlington, VA, USA., Bruijn L; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK, London, UK., Wuu J; Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Annals of neurology [Ann Neurol] 2024 Feb; Vol. 95 (2), pp. 211-216. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 28.
DOI: 10.1002/ana.26860
Abstrakt: Objective: To explore whether the utility of neurofilament light chain (NfL), as a biomarker to aid amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development, would be enhanced by obtaining formal qualification from the US Food and Drug Administration for a defined context-of-use.
Methods: Consensus discussion among academic, industry, and patient advocacy group representatives.
Results: A wealth of scientific evidence supports the use of NfL as a prognostic, response, and potential safety biomarker in the broad ALS population, and as a risk/susceptibility biomarker among the subset of SOD1 pathogenic variant carriers. Although NfL has not yet been formally qualified for any of these contexts-of-use, the US Food and Drug Administration has provided accelerated approval for an SOD1-lowering antisense oligonucleotide, based partially on the recognition that a reduction in NfL is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit.
Interpretation: The increasing incorporation of NfL into ALS therapy development plans provides evidence that its utility-as a prognostic, response, risk/susceptibility, and/or safety biomarker-is already widely accepted by the community. The willingness of the US Food and Drug Administration to base regulatory decisions on rigorous peer-reviewed data-absent formal qualification, leads us to conclude that formal qualification, despite some benefits, is not essential for ongoing and future use of NfL as a tool to aid ALS therapy development. Although the balance of considerations for and against seeking NfL biomarker qualification will undoubtedly vary across different diseases and contexts-of-use, the robustness of the published data and careful deliberations of the ALS community may offer valuable insights for other disease communities grappling with the same issues. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:211-216.
(© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)
Databáze: MEDLINE