A scoping review and best evidence synthesis for treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Autor: Eubank BHF; Faculty of Health, Community, and Education, Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada. Electronic address: beubank@mtroyal.ca., Sheps DM; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Dennett L; Health Sciences Librarian, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Connick A; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Bouliane M; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Panu A; Division of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Harding G; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Beaupre LA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery [J Shoulder Elbow Surg] 2024 Mar; Vol. 33 (3), pp. e126-e152. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.027
Abstrakt: Background: Rotator cuff disorders include a broad spectrum of pathological conditions including partial-thickness and full-thickness tears. Studies have shown partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) prevalence to be twice that of full-thickness tears. In the working population, PTRCTs are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and often result in occupational disability due to pain, stiffness, and loss of shoulder function. Treatment of PTRCTs remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to consolidate the existing high-quality evidence on best management approaches in treating PTRCTs using both nonoperative and operative approaches.
Methods: A scoping review with best evidence synthesis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), PubMed Central, and Science Direct were searched from 2000 to March 3, 2023. Level 1 studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included level 1 and 2 studies, were included.
Results: The search yielded 8276 articles. A total of 3930 articles were screened after removing 4346 duplicates. Application of inclusion criteria resulted in 662 articles that were selected for full-text review. Twenty-eight level 1 studies, 1 systematic review, 4 meta-analyses, and 1 network meta-analyses were included in the best evidence synthesis. Nonoperative strategies included injections (ie, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroid, prolotherapy, sodium hyaluronate, anesthetic, and atelocollagen), exercise therapy, and physical agents. Operative interventions consisted of débridement, shaving of the tendon and footprint, transtendon repair, and traditional suture anchor repair techniques with and without tear completion. Both nonoperative and operative strategies demonstrated effectiveness at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. The evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical intervention in treating PTRCTs regardless of arthroscopic technique.
Conclusion: The results of this scoping review do not support superiority of operative over nonoperative management and suggest that both strategies can be effective at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. Surgery, however, is the most invasive and costly approach, with the highest risk of complications such as infection. Other variables such as patient expectation, treating practitioner bias, or preference may change which modalities are offered and in what sequence.
(Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: