Maintenance of permanent sexual activity throughout the year in seasonal bucks using short photoperiodic cycles in open barns.

Autor:	Delgadillo JA; Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico., Espinoza-Flores LA; Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico., López-Magaña D; Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico., Hernández H; Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico., Keller M; Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France., Chesneau D; Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France., Lainé AL; Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France., Chemineau P; Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France. Electronic address: Philippe.Chemineau@inrae.fr.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience [Animal] 2024 Jan; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 101041. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 27.
DOI:	10.1016/j.animal.2023.101041
Abstrakt:	Seasonality of reproductive activity in rams and bucks is the major constraint in temperate and subtropical zones. Rapid alternation between 1 month of short days and 1 month of long days (LD) over three years in lightproof buildings eliminates this seasonality. We examined if this would also work in open barns, using only supplementary light. Over two years, one group of bucks (n = 7) was subjected to alternate 1 month of LD and 1 month of permanent light (LD-LL) and another group (n = 7) to alternate 1 month of LD and 1 month of natural light (LD-NL). A simultaneous control group, used for both experiments (CG1, n = 6; CG2, n = 6), remained under natural photoperiod. BW, testis weight (TW), plasma testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) were evaluated in all bucks. CG1 and CG2 bucks showed identical dramatic seasonal variations in BW (stable or decreasing in summer), TW (from 85 ± 12 g in February to 127 ± 7 g in July) and T (from 2.7 ± 1.2 ng/mL in January-April to 24.3 ± 3.2 ng/mL in June-October). By contrast, BW of LD-LL and LD-NL bucks increased regularly during the experiment. From 5 and 9 months after the experiment onset, LD-LL and LD-NL bucks, respectively, maintained constant TW of 115 ± 5 g until the experiment end. After the first 3 months <5 ng/mL, T of LD-LL bucks remained constant (5-10 ng/mL) until the experiment end. By contrast, T of LD-NL bucks showed four periods of low (<5 ng/mL) and two periods of high concentrations (18.1 ± 2.6 and 11.9 ± 3.4 ng/mL). Plasma C remained low (5-8 ng/mL) and did not change with group or light treatment. These results show for the first time in any seasonal photoperiodic species that it is possible to maintain the sexual activity of males all year round in open buildings using alternating periods of LD and LL. By contrast, return to NL instead of LL every other month does not prevent seasonality in T concentration. These results raise interesting questions about the photoperiodic control of neuroendocrine regulation of seasonal sexual activity and suggest that these treatments can be used to manage males in open barns in farms and in artificial insemination centres. (Spanish and French versions of the full text are available as Supplementary Materials S1 and S2). (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu