A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study.

Autor: Sivaramakrishnan D; Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom., Baker G; Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom., Parker RA; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom., Manner J; Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom., Lloyd S; Public Health South Tees, Middlesbrough Council and Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.; Fuse-UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Population Health Sciences Institute, William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.; Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom., Jepson R; Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2023 Dec 15; Vol. 18 (12), pp. e0293602. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 15 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293602
Abstrakt: Introduction: Contact centres have higher levels of sedentary behaviour than other office-based workplaces. Stand Up for Health (SUH) is a theory-based intervention developed using the 6SQuID framework to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centre workers. The aim of this study was to test acceptability and feasibility of implementing SUH in UK contact centres.
Methods: The study was conducted in 2020-2022 (pre COVID and during lockdown) and used a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design including a process evaluation. The intervention included working with contact centre managers to develop and implement a customised action plan aligning with SUH's theory of change. Workplace sedentary time, measured using activPAL™ devices, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included productivity, mental wellbeing, musculoskeletal health and physical activity. Empirical estimates of between-centre standard deviation and within-centre standard deviation of outcomes from pre-lockdown data were calculated to inform sample size calculations for future trials. The process evaluation adopted the RE-AIM framework to understand acceptability and feasibility of implementing the intervention. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with contact centre employees and managers, and activity preferences were collected using a questionnaire.
Results: A total of 11 contact centres participated: 155 employees from 6 centres in the pre-lockdown data collection, and 54 employees from 5 centres post-lockdown. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 33 employees and managers, and 96 participants completed an intervention activity preference questionnaire. Overall, the intervention was perceived as acceptable and feasible to deliver. Most centres implemented several intervention activities aligned with SUH's theory of change and over 50% of staff participated in at least one activity (pre-lockdown period). Perceived benefits including reduced sedentary behaviour, increased physical activity, and improved staff morale and mood were reported by contact centre employees and managers.
Conclusions: SUH demonstrates potential as an appealing and acceptable intervention, impacting several wellbeing outcomes.
Trial Registration: The trial has been registered on the ISRCTNdatabase: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11580369.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2023 Sivaramakrishnan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: