Measuring whole body inert gas wash-out.

Autor:	Plogmark O; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.; Swedish Armed Forces Diving and Naval Medicine Center, Swedish Armed Forces, Karlskrona, Sweden.; Corresponding author: Oscar Plogmark, Sölvegatan 19, 221 85 Lund, Sweden, ORCiD: 0009-0008-3230-8807, oscar.plogmark@med.lu.se., Silvanius M; Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics and Natural Science, Karlskrona, Sweden., Olsson M; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden., Hjelte C; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.; Swedish Armed Forces Diving and Naval Medicine Center, Swedish Armed Forces, Karlskrona, Sweden., Ekström M; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden., Frånberg O; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.; Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics and Natural Science, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Diving and hyperbaric medicine [Diving Hyperb Med] 2023 Dec 20; Vol. 53 (4), pp. 321-326.
DOI:	10.28920/dhm53.4.321-326
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Quantifying inert gas wash-out is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In this study, we developed a portable closed-circuit device for measuring inert gas wash-out and validated its precision and accuracy both with and without human subjects. Methods: We developed an exhalate monitor with sensors for volume, temperature, water vapor and oxygen. Inert gas volume was extrapolated from these inputs using the ideal gas law. The device's ability to detect volume differences while connected to a breathing machine was analysed by injecting a given gas volume eight times. One hundred and seventy-two coupled before-and-after measurements were then compared with a paired t-test. Drift in measured inert gas volume during unlabored breathing was evaluated in three subjects at rest using multilevel linear regression. A quasi-experimental cross-over study with the same subjects was conducted to evaluate the device's ability to detect inert gas changes in relation to diving interventions and simulate power. Results: The difference between the injected volume (1,996 ml) and the device's measured volume (1,986 ml) was -10 ml. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the measured volume was 1,969 to 2,003 ml. Mean drift during a 43 min period of unlaboured breathing was -19 ml, (95% CI, -37 to -1). Our power simulation, based on a cross-over study design, determined a sample size of two subjects to detect a true mean difference of total inert gas wash-out volume of 100 ml. Conclusions: We present a portable device with acceptable precision and accuracy to measure inert gas wash-out differences that may be physiologically relevant in the pathophysiology of decompression sickness. (Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu