Abortion Trigger Laws Compared With the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.
| Autor: | Cherry SB; WellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Obstetrics and gynecology [Obstet Gynecol] 2024 Mar 01; Vol. 143 (3), pp. 366-368. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 12. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005483 |
| Abstrakt: | In 2022, the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization reneged the Constitutional right to an abortion. Many states now enforce laws that ban abortions. There are significant conflicts between state abortion laws and federal regulations that mandate proper assessment, treatment, and stabilization of patients who present for emergency care. This conflict places physicians in an untenable position when treating patients who have a pregnancy that endangers their life. In states that deem abortion a felony, transfer of these patients can extricate the physician, who is in a difficult position. Currently, it is the only reasonable option for hospitals and physicians who are trapped between conflicting state laws and Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act rules and regulations. (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|