| Autor: |
Petruseviciene L; Department of Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania., Sack AT; Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands., Kubilius R; Department of Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania., Savickas R; Department of Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background and Objectives : Stroke is a major cause of death and disability worldwide; therefore, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is being widely studied and clinically applied to improve motor deficits in the affected arm. However, recent studies indicate that the function of both arms can be affected after stroke. It currently remains unknown how various TMS methods affect the function of the ipsilesional upper extremity. Materials and Methods : Thirty-five subacute stroke patients with upper extremity motor deficits were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into three groups, receiving either (1) low-frequency rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere; (2) high-frequency rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere; or (3) no stimulation. Experimental groups received 10 rTMS sessions over two weeks alongside standard rehabilitation, and the control group received the same procedures except for rTMS. Both affected and unaffected upper extremity motor function was evaluated using hand grip strength and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) tests before and after rehabilitation (7 weeks apart). Results : All groups showed significant improvement in both the affected and unaffected hand grip and FIM scores ( p < 0.05). HF-rTMS led to a notably higher increase in unaffected hand grip strength than the control group ( p = 0.007). There was no difference in the improvement in affected upper extremity motor function between the groups. The FIM score increase was lower in the control group compared to experimental groups, although not statistically significant. Conclusions : This study demonstrates the positive effect of ipsilesional HF-rTMS on the improvement in unaffected arm motor function and reveals the positive effect of both LF- and HF-rTMS on the affected upper extremity motor function recovery. |
