Quality of Digital Health Interventions Across Different Health Care Domains: Secondary Data Analysis Study.

Autor:	Hyzy M; School of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom., Bond R; School of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom., Mulvenna M; School of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom., Bai L; School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom., Dix A; Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom., Daly R; Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA), Daresbury, United Kingdom., Frey AL; Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA), Daresbury, United Kingdom., Leigh S; Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA), Daresbury, United Kingdom.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	JMIR mHealth and uHealth [JMIR Mhealth Uhealth] 2023 Nov 23; Vol. 11, pp. e47043. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 23.
DOI:	10.2196/47043
Abstrakt:	Background: There are more than 350,000 digital health interventions (DHIs) in the app stores. To ensure that they are effective and safe to use, they should be assessed for compliance with best practice standards. Objective: The objective of this paper was to examine and compare the compliance of DHIs with best practice standards and adherence to user experience (UX), professional and clinical assurance (PCA), and data privacy (DP). Methods: We collected assessment data from 1574 DHIs using the Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps Baseline Review (OBR) assessment tool. As part of the assessment, each DHI received a score out of 100 for each of the abovementioned areas (ie, UX, PCA, and DP). These 3 OBR scores are combined to make up the overall ORCHA score (a proxy for quality). Inferential statistics, probability distributions, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Cliff delta, and Dunn tests were used to conduct the data analysis. Results: We found that 57.3% (902/1574) of the DHIs had an Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA) score below the threshold of 65. The overall median OBR score (ORCHA score) for all DHIs was 61.5 (IQR 51.0-73.0) out of 100. A total of 46.2% (12/26) of DHI's health care domains had a median equal to or above the ORCHA threshold score of 65. For the 3 assessment areas (UX, DP, and PCA), DHIs scored the highest for the UX assessment 75.2 (IQR 70.0-79.6), followed by DP 65.1 (IQR 55.0-73.4) and PCA 49.6 (IQR 31.9-76.1). UX scores had the least variance (SD 13.9), while PCA scores had the most (SD 24.8). Respiratory and urology DHIs were consistently highly ranked in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework tiers B and C based on their ORCHA score. Conclusions: There is a high level of variability in the ORCHA scores of DHIs across different health care domains. This suggests that there is an urgent need to improve compliance with best practices in some health care areas. Possible explanations for the observed differences might include varied market maturity and commercial interests within the different health care domains. More investment to support the development of higher-quality DHIs in areas such as ophthalmology, allergy, women's health, sexual health, and dental care may be needed. (©Maciej Hyzy, Raymond Bond, Maurice Mulvenna, Lu Bai, Alan Dix, Robert Daly, Anna-Lena Frey, Simon Leigh. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 23.11.2023.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu